Dating in the dark australia application form chemical vs dating carbon
This document is not a scientific thesis, but an apologetic intended to be submitted and defended by me in an interactive, online electronic forum.
I claim no copyright on this document, and grant its use to the public domain.
Those wishing to be on the forefront of knowledge must look beyond this paper.
I am not a scientist, but an engineer by education and profession.
Even so, it is my conviction that no substantial scientific training or experience is required to confront evolutionism and defend recent creation.
I wish to thank my critics, especially those anti-creationists whom I have encountered along the way, for helping to expose deficiencies in my presentation, which has contributed greatly to the continuing refinement of this document.
The laws of biochemistry, probability and statistics, and basic information theory are against it. But no one has ever shown them to be beneficial, so as to result in complex and sophisticated designs. Random genetic mutations) The "survival of the fittest" clause is a tautology and success does not imply complexity.
Natural selection shouldn't be expected to result in functionally different or more complex designs. Animals vary based on coded genetic information that is already there.
When I speak of "creation," I am referring to the inherently obvious fact that the origin of all life forms can be attributed to a creator who purposefully created them with planning and intent, and the documented fact that this occurred over the course of a week's time several thousand years ago.I do not agree to defend this document in any forum that I did not submit it, due to the practical limitations of my own time.The original source of this document is located at originality of content of this document ranges from mere paraphrases of material from a wide assortment of authors to entirely original material that I have not seen expressed by any other author. I should point out that I do not consider myself an authority on the leading edge of modern creationism, although it may seem so to the uninitiated.There is no basis for even assuming the uniform and consistent application of natural law throughout all time. Catastrophism) Current methods for dating rocks and organic material using radioisotopes involve many assumptions about initial conditions and the environment that are not known. Objects known to be young have been dated using these methods with erroneous results.Uniformitarianism is an ideology without a foundation. These dating methods therefore cannot be considered reliable.